This technique lends itself to automation and high-volume production inspection—and is less expensive than other more sophisticated methods of quality assurance.
FAQs
 |
| This image is a bolt with a longitudinal crack. Source: Magnaflux
|
|
Here are some frequently asked questions about magnetic particle inspection:
Q: What are the advantages of magnetic particle inspection? A: The test method process is quick and simple in principle and application. It is highly sensitive to the detection of surface and slightly subsurface linear indications, and indications appear on the actual test part. The test method process may often work through contaminant layers and coating thickness, and the method lends itself to automation and high-volume production inspection. Finally, it is less expensive than other more sophisticated methods of quality assurance.
Q: What are the limitations of magnetic particle inspection? A: First, the test material must be ferrous. It provides limited and variable potential for detection of subsurface indications. Care is required to avoid burning and arcing of test part surface at points of electrical contact. The magnetic field direction must intercept the major dimension of the discontinuity. Complex test part geometry may sometimes pose problems with correct amperage determination and magnetic field intensity. Finally, demagnetization of the test part following the inspection is often necessary.
There are different types of magnetic particles: dry method non-fluorescent, wet method non-fluorescent and wet method fluorescent.
Q: What are the properties of dry powder and wet suspension magnetic particles? A: They are iron oxide particles, finely divided in sizes varying between 0.125 and 60 microns with a high permeability (easily magnetized) and low retentivity (ability to stay magnetized). Dry particles are chemically dyed to provide contrast against the background of the test surface. Stock colors are gray, red, black and yellow. Application is either with a squeeze bulb or spray gun. Wet suspension particles are suspended in an oil-based or water-based liquid vehicle or carrier. With water, operators must add conditioners in addition to a wetting agent and corrosion inhibitors.
 |
| This illustrates a bolt with a crack under the head. Source: Magnaflux |
|
Q: What is the sensitivity comparison between wet vs. dry methods? A: Wet method provides improved sensitivity for the detection of very fine surface flaws. Dry method provides improved sensitivity for the detection of subsurface flaws.
Q: What is the maximum depth that magnetic particles can detect a discontinuity? A: 1/4 inch, however 0.050 to 0.100 inch is a more realistic depth.
Magnetic particle inspection has a lot going for it. Along with being a quick test method, it is also less expensive than other more sophisticated methods of quality assurance.
ndt